So Noted. - sonoted.lol
Conflicts resolved by condemnation: zero.
In the span of 60 days in early 2026, the United States conducted military strikes in three sovereign nations - Venezuela, Nigeria, and Iran - while maintaining the position that it stands for rules-based international order.
The International Court of Justice ordered Russia to cease military operations in Ukraine in March 2022. More than four years later, Russia continues to bomb Ukrainian cities daily. The ICJ ordered Israel to prevent genocide in Gaza. Operations continued. The ICC issued arrest warrants. Nobody was arrested.
The UN General Assembly passed resolution after resolution. Each was ignored. The Security Council couldn't act because the aggressor held veto power - or the aggressor's ally did. The system designed to prevent wars became a stage for performative outrage.
Meanwhile, Oman's mediator announced a nuclear deal breakthrough with Iran on February 27th. On February 28th, the bombs started falling. In June a ceasefire memorandum was signed in Islamabad. In July the tankers were burning again.
Strong countries do what they want. Weak countries suffer what they must. Everyone else condemns. Your condemnation has been added to the pile. Nothing changes. The tracker continues.
So Noted. is a tracker of active military conflicts and the international condemnations issued against them. Each conflict records who said what, when they said it, what level of outrage they reached, and what happened next. You can add your own condemnation to any conflict - it is tallied by country alongside the statements of heads of state, foreign ministries and international courts, and it accomplishes precisely as much as theirs did.
The editorial voice is satirical. The underlying record is not. Nothing here had to be invented: the gap between what gets said and what gets done was already the joke.
Every condemnation is stored as a structured record with at least one source URL, and preferably two or more, ranked official statement first, then wire service, then major outlet. Quotes are reproduced verbatim from a fetched source rather than paraphrased into something punchier. Casualty figures are attributed to the specific organisation that published them. Every source carries the date it was published and the date it was last checked.
Those rules are written down in the project's docs/CONDEMNATION-SPEC.md, and they are enforced mechanically rather than on trust. A verification script - npm run verify - refetches each source, checks that every quote appears verbatim in the fetched text, checks that source URLs are article-shaped and come from credible domains, and validates the condemnation levels, entity types, country codes and dates. It runs in CI on every change, and it fails the build rather than let an unsupported claim ship quietly.
Every condemnation on this site was actually issued by the entity credited with it. Every court order, arrest warrant and provisional measure was actually handed down. Every quote was actually said. If you think an entry is wrong, follow its sources - they are all linked from the conflict it belongs to. Corrections are welcome; inventions are not, and they would ruin the point.
The citizen leaderboard is the one place on the site where the numbers come from visitors rather than from governments. It is anonymous, aggregated by country, and just as ineffective.